chore: rimraf #181
chore: rimraf #181
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a new development dependency Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
scripts/fetch-ui.sh (1)
Line range hint
3-3: Consider version pinning for securityThe script clones from a hardcoded repository URL without version pinning, which could be a security risk if the repository is compromised.
Suggest using a specific commit or tag:
-git clone https://github.com/yorkie-team/yorkie-ui-old.git temp +git clone --depth 1 --branch <specific-tag> https://github.com/yorkie-team/yorkie-ui-old.git temp
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
scripts/fetch-ui.sh (1)
9-10: Add directory existence checkThe script should verify directory existence before removal/creation to prevent potential issues.
-npx rimraf src/assets -mkdir -p src/assets +if [ -d "src/assets" ]; then + npx rimraf src/assets +fi +mkdir -p src/assetspackage.json (1)
140-142: Consider using exact versionFor build tools and scripts, it's often safer to use exact versions to ensure consistent behavior across different environments.
"devDependencies": { - "rimraf": "^6.0.1" + "rimraf": "6.0.1" }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
package.json(1 hunks)scripts/fetch-ui.sh(1 hunks)
| npx rimraf src/assets | ||
| mkdir -p src/assets | ||
| cp -R ./temp/dist/assets/* src/assets | ||
| rm -rf temp | ||
| cp -R ./temp/dist/assets/* src/assets | ||
| npx rimraf temp |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add error handling and cleanup
The script lacks error handling which could lead to incomplete execution or inconsistent state. Consider adding error handling and cleanup.
Here's a suggested improvement:
#!/usr/bin/env bash
+set -euo pipefail
+
+cleanup() {
+ if [ -d "temp" ]; then
+ npx rimraf temp
+ fi
+}
+
+trap cleanup EXIT
+
git clone https://github.com/yorkie-team/yorkie-ui-old.git temp
cd temp
npm install
npm run build-admin
cd ..
npx rimraf src/assets
+[ $? -eq 0 ] || exit 1
+
mkdir -p src/assets
cp -R ./temp/dist/assets/* src/assets
+[ $? -eq 0 ] || exit 1
+
npx rimraf temp
mv src/assets/images/favicon* public/
mv src/assets/images/og* public/📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| npx rimraf src/assets | |
| mkdir -p src/assets | |
| cp -R ./temp/dist/assets/* src/assets | |
| rm -rf temp | |
| cp -R ./temp/dist/assets/* src/assets | |
| npx rimraf temp | |
| #!/usr/bin/env bash | |
| set -euo pipefail | |
| cleanup() { | |
| if [ -d "temp" ]; then | |
| npx rimraf temp | |
| fi | |
| } | |
| trap cleanup EXIT | |
| git clone https://github.com/yorkie-team/yorkie-ui-old.git temp | |
| cd temp | |
| npm install | |
| npm run build-admin | |
| cd .. | |
| npx rimraf src/assets | |
| [ $? -eq 0 ] || exit 1 | |
| mkdir -p src/assets | |
| cp -R ./temp/dist/assets/* src/assets | |
| [ $? -eq 0 ] || exit 1 | |
| npx rimraf temp | |
| mv src/assets/images/favicon* public/ | |
| mv src/assets/images/og* public/ |
| @@ -136,5 +136,8 @@ | |||
| "last 1 firefox version", | |||
| "last 1 safari version" | |||
| ] | |||
| }, | |||
| "devDependencies": { | |||
| "rimraf": "^6.0.1" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
The specified version of rimraf (^6.0.1) requires Node.js version 20 or >=22, but the project doesn't specify Node.js engine requirements in package.json. Since rimraf is only used in build scripts for directory cleanup operations, consider either:
- Adding Node.js engine requirements to package.json
- Using an older version of rimraf (e.g., 5.x.x) with broader Node.js version support
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify rimraf version compatibility
Let's verify the compatibility and security of the specified rimraf version.
Let me check the Node.js version used in the project to ensure compatibility.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for known vulnerabilities and latest version
npm view rimraf versions --json | jq -r '.[-1]'
npm audit --json | jq '.advisories | select(.[].module_name=="rimraf")'
# Check minimum supported Node.js version for rimraf 6.0.1
npm view rimraf@6.0.1 engines
Length of output: 244
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check Node.js version requirements in package.json
cat package.json | jq '.engines'
# Also check for any rimraf usage patterns in the codebase
rg "rimraf" -g "!package*.json" -g "!node_modules" -A 2
Length of output: 380
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/ci.yml (1)
Line range hint
13-13: Consider updating checkout action to v3.The workflow uses an older version of the checkout action (v2.3.1) while other actions are on v2+. Consider updating to v3 for potential improvements and security fixes.
- uses: actions/checkout@v2.3.1 + uses: actions/checkout@v3🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
19-19: the runner of "actions/setup-node@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
.github/workflows/ghpages-publish.yml (1)
Line range hint
23-23: Consider updating github-pages-deploy-action.The workflow uses an older version (4.1.0) of JamesIves/github-pages-deploy-action. Consider updating to the latest version for potential improvements and security fixes.
- uses: JamesIves/github-pages-deploy-action@4.1.0 + uses: JamesIves/github-pages-deploy-action@v4🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
13-13: the runner of "actions/setup-node@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.github/workflows/ci.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/ghpages-publish.yml(1 hunks).nvmrc(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- .nvmrc
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/ci.yml (1)
21-21: LGTM! Using .nvmrc is a better practice for version management.
The change to use node-version-file instead of hardcoded version improves maintainability and ensures consistency across environments.
Let's verify the existence and content of the .nvmrc file:
✅ Verification successful
✅ Node.js version configuration is properly set up with .nvmrc
The .nvmrc file exists and specifies Node.js version 20, which is a stable LTS version. This confirms that the CI workflow's use of node-version-file: '.nvmrc' is correctly configured and will work as intended.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if .nvmrc exists and contains valid version
if [ -f ".nvmrc" ]; then
echo "Content of .nvmrc:"
cat .nvmrc
else
echo "Warning: .nvmrc file not found"
fi
Length of output: 82
.github/workflows/ghpages-publish.yml (1)
15-15: LGTM! Node.js version management is consistent with CI workflow.
The change to use .nvmrc aligns with the CI workflow, ensuring consistent Node.js versions across all workflows.
What this PR does / why we need it?
You can't run rm -rf on Windows os. We've added limraf dependencies to run the same action.
I didn't have access to https://github.com/yorkie-team/yorkie-ui-old repo, so I couldn't proceed with the script test, but I confirmed that the command 'npx limraf' works instead of 'rm -rf'.
Any background context you want to provide?
What are the relevant tickets?
Fixes #
Checklist
Summary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
rimrafas a development dependency for improved file and directory management..nvmrcfile for consistent Node.js version management.Bug Fixes
fetch-ui.shscript.Chores
fetch-ui.shscript for better performance..nvmrcfile.